Combined conservative interventions for urge, stress or mixed incontinence in adults

French, B, Thomas, L, Leathley, MJ, Sutton, CJ, Booth, J, Brittain, K, Cheater, F, Roe, Brenda, Hay-Smith, JC and MCAdam, J (2010) Combined conservative interventions for urge, stress or mixed incontinence in adults. Protocol in the Cochrane Library (12). pp. 1-7. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008910

Item not available from this archive. (Request a copy)

Abstract

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To determine whether combinations of conservative interventions for urge, stress, or mixed urinary incontinence reduce the number of people with urinary incontinence compared against no treatment/usual care, or another intervention. The secondary objectives are to determine the effect of combined conservative interventions on subjective perceptions of cure or improvement; the severity of incontinence or urinary symptoms; quality of life or symptom distress; satisfaction with treatment; cost; or adverse events. The specific comparisons to be made include: combined conservative intervention versus no active treatment (e.g. no treatment, wait list control, attention control or usual care); combined conservative intervention versus another single active treatment (e.g. a single conservative intervention, or an active non-conservative intervention); one combined conservative intervention versus another combined active conservative treatment.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Cochrane Review ID-159009103012214813.
Subjects: R Medicine > RT Nursing
Divisions: Nursing and Midwifery
Date Deposited: 02 Feb 2018 14:58
URI: http://repository.edgehill.ac.uk/id/eprint/10079

Archive staff only

Item control page Item control page