A Critique of the Value Interaction Debate

McGregor, Rafe (2014) A Critique of the Value Interaction Debate. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 54 (4). pp. 449-466. ISSN 0007-0904 DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayt052

[img]
Preview
Text
McGregor Critique of the Value Interaction Debate (final).pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (490kB) | Preview

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to show that the value interaction debate is deeply flawed and constitutes a superficial analysis of the relationship between morality and art. I introduce the debate, which concerns whether a moral defect in a work of art is (also) an aesthetic defect, in Section 1. Section 2 establishes the vagueness of two key terms in the discussion, moral defects and aesthetic defects. In Section 3, I introduce the naive assumption-uninteresting claim disjunction, identifying five of the six approaches as demonstrating a fundamental naivety about the relationship between morality and narrative art. I show, in Section 4, that four of the six are philosophically uninteresting as they offer an incomplete—and ultimately unsatisfactory—explanation of this relationship. In Section 5, I discuss the quantity and quality of examples employed in the debate, many of which are non-canonical, and some of which are entirely inappropriate. I conclude by recommending a reorientation of the debate to focus on the underlying question of whether the characteristically artistic value is finally or instrumentally valuable.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: N Fine Arts > NX Arts in general
Divisions: Law and Criminology
Date Deposited: 26 Nov 2018 11:41
URI: http://repository.edgehill.ac.uk/id/eprint/10865

Archive staff only

Item control page Item control page