Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction

Shaw, R., Kanatas, A., Lowe, D., Brown, J., Rogers, S. and Vaughan, E. (2004) Comparison of miniplates and reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction. Head & Neck, 26 (5). pp. 456-463. ISSN 1043-3074 DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.10343

Item not available from this archive.

Abstract

Background. The aim of this study is to compare complication rates of miniplates versus reconstruction plates in the fixation of vascularized grafts into segmental mandibular defects. Methods. Retrospective analysis of 143 consecutive successful microvascular composite flaps performed between 1993 and 2001 was performed. Data were gathered from a computerized database, case notes and pathology reports. Complications were classified as dehiscence, infection, plate or bone removal. Results. In the series, 49% of patients received miniplates, and 51% received plates. No significant differences in complication rates were found between those grafts fixed with miniplates (27%) and those with reconstruction plates (30%). Plate choice was primarily determined by consultant preference. No significant differences were found in patient, defect, treatrnent, or follow-up characteristics between the plate groups. Twenty-nine percent of patients had at least one late complication at the reconstructed site, and this was higher (39%) in those who had postoperative radiotherapy. Conclusions. No evidence was found in this study that the increased rigidity offered by reconstruction plates influences the rate of plate or bone removal, infection, or plate exposure. Thus, the decision to use reconstruction or miniplates is not dependent on the rate of plate complications.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RK Dentistry
Divisions: Nursing and Midwifery
Date Deposited: 22 Feb 2011 15:23
URI: http://repository.edgehill.ac.uk/id/eprint/2604

Archive staff only

Item control page Item control page