The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: A comparison of DRM and categorized lists

Knott, Lauren and Dewhurst, S. A (2007) The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: A comparison of DRM and categorized lists. Memory & Cognition, 35 (8). pp. 1954-1965. ISSN 0090-502X DOI https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192928

Item not available from this archive.

Abstract

Three experiments investigated the effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval on false recognition. In Experiment 1, participants studied word lists in either full or divided attention (random number generation) conditions and then took part in a recognition test with full attention. In Experiment 2, after studying word lists with full attention, participants carried out a recognition test with either full or divided attention. Experiment 3 manipulated attention at both study and test. We also compared Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) and categorized lists, due to recent claims regarding the locus of false memories produced by such lists (Smith, Gerkens, Pierce, & Choi, 2002). With both list types, false “remember” responses were reduced by divided attention at encoding and increased by divided attention at retrieval. The findings suggest that the production of false memories occurs as a result of the generation of associates at encoding and failures of source monitoring retrieval. Crucially, this is true for both DRM and categorized lists.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Psychology
Date Deposited: 13 Apr 2011 15:52
URI: http://repository.edgehill.ac.uk/id/eprint/3016

Archive staff only

Item control page Item control page