Validity of a portable urine refractometer: The effects of sample freezing

Sparks, Andy and Close, G L (2013) Validity of a portable urine refractometer: The effects of sample freezing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 31 (7). pp. 745-749. ISSN 0264-0414 DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.747693

Item not available from this archive. (Request a copy)

Abstract

The use of portable urine osmometers is widespread, but no studies have assessed the validity of this measurement technique. Furthermore, it is unclear what effect freezing has on osmolality. One-hundred participants of mean (±SD) age 25.1 ± 7.6 years, height 1.77 ± 0.1 m and weight 77.1 ± 10.8 kg provided single urine samples that were analysed using freeze point depression (FPD) and refractometry (RI). Samples were then frozen at −80°C (n = 81) and thawed prior to re-analysis. Differences between methods and freezing were determined using Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Relationships between measurements were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and typical error of estimate (TE). Osmolality was lower (P = 0.001) using RI (634.2 ± 339.8 mOsm · kgH2O−1) compared with FPD (656.7 ± 334.1 mOsm · kgH2O−1) but the TE was trivial (0.17). Freezing significantly reduced mean osmolality using FPD (656.7 ± 341.1 to 606.5 ± 333.4 mOsm · kgH2O−1; P < 0.001), but samples were still highly related following freezing (ICC, r = 0.979, P < 0.001, CI = 0.993–0.997; TE = 0.15; and r=0.995, P < 0.001, CI = 0.967–0.986; TE = 0.07 for RI and FPD respectively). Despite mean differences between methods and as a result of freezing, such differences are physiologically trivial. Therefore, the use of RI appears to be a valid measurement tool to determine urine osmolality

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Q Science > QP Physiology
Divisions: Sports Science
Date Deposited: 27 Nov 2012 10:53
URI: http://repository.edgehill.ac.uk/id/eprint/4561

Archive staff only

Item control page Item control page