Characteristics and referral of head and neck cancer patients who report chewing and dental issues on the Patient Concerns Inventory

Mahmood, R, Butterworth, C, Lowe, D and Rogers, Simon (2014) Characteristics and referral of head and neck cancer patients who report chewing and dental issues on the Patient Concerns Inventory. British Dental Journal, 216. E25. ISSN 0007-0610 DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.453

Item not available from this archive. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Background: Patients experience considerable dental-related difficulties following head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment including problems with chewing, dry mouth, oral hygiene, appearance and self-esteem. These can go unrecognised in busy follow-up clinics. The Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) is specifically for HNC patients, enabling them to select topics they wish to discuss and members of the multi-professional team they want to see. Aim: The study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics of patients raising dental concerns on the PCI and to explore the outcome of onward referral. Assessments included the PCI and the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) version 4, with clinic details collated from hospital and cancer databases. Method: PCI data were obtained from 317 HNC patients between 2007 and 2011. Their mean age was 63 years and 60% were male. Most had oral squamous cell carcinoma and underwent surgery. The median (IQR) time from treatment to first PCI was 13 (4-42) months. Results: Three comparison groups were identified: patients with significant chewing problems, patients without significant chewing problems who wanted to discuss dental-related concerns and patients without significant chewing problems who did not want to discuss such concerns. Fifty-two percent reported either a significant chewing problem on the UW-QOL or a wish to discuss dental-related concerns. A quarter specifically asked to talk to a dental professional. Clinical characteristics significantly associated with dental issues were stage, primary treatment and free flap reconstruction. Clinic letters were copied to only 10% of general dental practitioners (GDPs). Conclusion: Better communication with GDPs is essential

Item Type: Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RT Nursing
Divisions: Nursing and Midwifery
Date Deposited: 28 Jul 2014 10:50
URI: http://repository.edgehill.ac.uk/id/eprint/6074

Archive staff only

Item control page Item control page