Intention, description and the aesthetic: the by-product argument

Culbertson, Leon (2016) Intention, description and the aesthetic: the by-product argument. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 43 (3). pp. 440-453. ISSN 0094-8705 DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2016.1227262

[img] Text
FINAL VERSION Intention, Description and the Aesthetic - The By-product Argument copy L Culbertson.docx - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (47kB)

Abstract

Stephen Mumford argues that positive aesthetic value is a by-product of both sport and art, and that the principal aim of the artist and the player or athlete could not be to produce positive aesthetic value. Three features of Mumford’s by-product argument are considered. It is argued that problems arise as a result of failure to appreciate Best’s distinction between the evaluative and conceptual uses of ‘aesthetic’, the nature of the descriptions Mumford gives of the intention of the artist in making art and the necessary implicit premises in the argument. There is, therefore, reason to think that Mumford has not established that sport and art are in the same position in the ways in which their aims relate to aesthetic values, nor that the by-product argument can form part of a counter to Best’s position.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Aesthetics of sport; the aesthetic; art; intention of the artist; Stephen Mumford; David Best
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Psychology
Date Deposited: 15 Nov 2016 09:56
URI: http://repository.edgehill.ac.uk/id/eprint/8242

Archive staff only

Item control page Item control page