How equitable is vocational rehabilitation in Sweden? A review of evidence on the implementation of a national policy framework

Burstrom, Bo, Nylen, Lotta, Clayton, Stephen and Whitehead, Margaret (2010) How equitable is vocational rehabilitation in Sweden? A review of evidence on the implementation of a national policy framework. Disability and rehabilitation, 33 (6). pp. 453-466. DOI https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.493596

[img] Text
Burstrom et al How equitable submitted version.doc - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (129kB)
[img] Spreadsheet
Table 1 and 2 Burstrom.xls - Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (28kB)

Abstract

Purpose. Under the national framework law in Sweden, all eligible people should have equal chances of receiving vocational rehabilitation. We aimed to review the evidence on (1) whether access to vocational rehabilitation is equitable in practice and (2) whether the outcomes vary for different groups in the population. Method. Systematic review of studies in Sweden that reported diagnostic or socio-demographic characteristics of people offered or taking up rehabilitation programmes and outcomes of such programmes for different diagnostic and sociodemographic groups. Searches of 11 relevant electronic databases, 15 organisational websites, citation searching and contact with experts in the field, for the period 1990–2009. Results. A total of 11 studies were included in the final review, six of which addressed review question (1) and seven addressed review question (2). All the six observational studies of access reported biased selection into vocational rehabilitation: greater likelihood for men, younger people, those with longer-term sick leave, those with lower income, employed rather than unemployed people and those with musculoskeletal and mental disorders or alcohol abuse. Having had a rehabilitation investigation also increased the likelihood of receiving vocational rehabilitation. Differential outcome of rehabilitation was reported in seven studies: outcomes were better for men, younger people, employed individuals, those with shorter sick leave and those with higher income. Selection into vocational rehabilitation was perceived as important for successful outcomes, but success also depended on the state of the local labour market. Conclusions. There is evidence of socio-demographic differences in access to and outcomes of vocational rehabilitation in Sweden, even though the national framework law is meant to apply to everyone. Few studies have deliberately measured differential access or outcomes, and there is a need for this kind of equity analysis of population-wide policies. Studies evaluating the effects of vocational rehabilitation must consider selection into the programmes for adequate interpretation of impact results. Keywords: Social differentials, vocational rehabilitation, equity

Item Type: Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Divisions: Nursing and Midwifery
Date Deposited: 23 Feb 2017 16:43
URI: http://repository.edgehill.ac.uk/id/eprint/8464

Archive staff only

Item control page Item control page