Objective and subjective evaluation of High Dynamic Range video compression

Mukherjee, R, Debattista, K, Bashford-Rogers, T, Vangorp, Peter, Mantiuk, R, Bessa, M, Waterfield, B and Chalmers, A (2016) Objective and subjective evaluation of High Dynamic Range video compression. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 47. pp. 426-437. ISSN 0923-5965 DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2016.08.001

[img]
Preview
Text
article.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (4MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
supplementary_material.pdf - Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

A number of High Dynamic Range (HDR) video compression algorithms proposed to date have either been developed in isolation or only-partially compared with each other. Previous evaluations were conducted using quality assessment error metrics, which for the most part were developed for qualitative assessment of Low Dynamic Range (LDR) videos. This paper presents a comprehensive objective and subjective evaluation conducted with six published HDR video compression algorithms. The objective evaluation was undertaken on a large set of 39 HDR video sequences using seven numerical error metrics namely: PSNR, logPSNR, puPSNR, puSSIM, Weber MSE, HDR-VDP and HDRVQM. The subjective evaluation involved six short-listed sequences and two ranking-based subjective experiments with hidden reference at two different output bitrates with 32 participants each, who were tasked to rank distorted HDR video footage compared to an uncompressed version of the same footage. Results suggest a strong correlation between the objective and subjective evaluation. Also, non-backward compatible compression algorithms appear to perform better at lower output bit rates than backward compatible algorithms across the settings used in this evaluation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: HDR video; Compression algorithm; Quality assessment; Ranking; Ratedistortion
Subjects: T Technology > T Technology (General)
Divisions: Computing and Information Systems
Date Deposited: 09 Feb 2017 15:14
URI: http://repository.edgehill.ac.uk/id/eprint/8662

Archive staff only

Item control page Item control page